| Export-control / EAR exposure |
Bare TFLN and LNOI wafers are typically classified EAR99 — they do not appear on the Commerce Control List under current BIS rules and therefore do not require an export licence for most Western destinations. Asaptic conducts end-use and end-user screening on every shipment and provides destination-country documentation (end-user statement, shipper's export declaration support) as standard. Buyers with internal legal requirements for export-control sign-off receive a written screening summary per order. |
| Quality and yield consistency |
Asaptic sources factory-direct from foundries pre-qualified on process consistency and documentation standards — no spot-market or secondary-market material. For orders where uniformity matters (modulator fabrication, quantum transduction), we request priority allocation from established 200 mm production lines where within-wafer thickness variation and etch-depth control are tightest. Lot certificates and process data sheets accompany every shipment; third-party metrology is arranged on request. |
| Lead time and allocation risk |
TFLN foundry capacity is constrained globally. Deposit-first engagement — 30% on proforma invoice — secures your production slot before fabrication begins. Standard in-stock wafers (X-cut and Z-cut, 4-inch, MgO-doped, 500 nm film) target shipment within 5 business days of deposit clearance. Custom specifications and EO modulator orders target approximately 12-week windows, with priority scheduling available for higher-uniformity modulator lots. No slot is held without deposit; no deposit is taken without a proforma invoice. |
| What certifications are required for BESS exports from China, and which standards apply by destination? |
The certification pathway varies by destination market. UN 38.3 transport testing is mandatory for lithium cell and battery shipments by air, sea, or road, with a lithium battery test summary and dangerous-goods declaration accompanying each consignment. IEC 62619 / EN IEC 62619:2022 is the primary global safety standard for industrial lithium batteries and supports EU conformity under the Low Voltage Directive. For the US, UL 9540 system-level NRTL listing is required by NEC Article 706 and adopted building/fire codes in most jurisdictions, with UL 9540A fire-propagation test data separately required by local fire authorities; Chinese GB 36276 and GB/T 36558 certifications are not accepted substitutes by US AHJs. NFPA 855 governs US installation requirements including clearance, suppression, and signage. |
| What is the EU Battery Regulation position on BESS? |
Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 applies to all battery chemistries without exception, including lithium-ion and sodium-ion. Industrial batteries at or above 2 kWh capacity are subject to carbon footprint declaration, due diligence, and battery passport requirements. |
| What is the UK conformity mark for BESS? |
UKCA marking is required under the Electrical Equipment (Safety) Regulations 2016 (SI 2016/1101) for the Great Britain market. CE marking was accepted under a transitional arrangement, but manufacturers should verify current acceptance status with OPSS because transition periods have been subject to revision. |
| What grid-connection standard applies to BESS connecting to the UK distribution network? |
ENA Engineering Recommendation G99, for generators and storage at or above 16 A per phase, or G98 for smaller installations, applies to battery storage systems regardless of chemistry. G99 requires type-test evidence and registration with the distribution network operator before energisation. |
| What GaN device certification framework applies in automotive applications? |
For automotive GaN devices, AEC-Q101 is the accepted qualification framework for discrete semiconductors. Asaptic scopes the compliance pathway to the actual end-use context, including documented assessment for advanced GaN in defence, radar, or high-power microwave applications. |
| Is BESS easier to transport internationally if built with sodium-ion chemistry? |
Potentially yes for certain cell designs. Na-ion cells discharged below the UN 38.3 threshold or passing relevant tests at lower risk levels may qualify for less restrictive UN transport classifications, UN 3551/3552 under UN Model Regulations Rev. 23, compared with equivalent Li-ion. Each cell chemistry and format must still pass the full UN 38.3 test series before any classification benefit applies. |